Why Interviewers Ask This Question
- •To assess your interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence
- •To see how you handle difficult people and situations
- •To evaluate your conflict resolution and communication style
- •To determine if you take ownership or blame others
- •To predict how you'll handle future workplace conflicts
How to Structure Your Answer: STAR with Empathy
STAR method enhanced with perspective-taking and relationship focus.
- 1
Situation - Briefly set context (who, what, when)
- 2
Task - Explain the conflict and stakes
- 3
Action - Detail YOUR approach, including understanding their perspective
- 4
Result - Resolution + relationship outcome + learning
Generic vs. Personalized Answer
Generic Answer
What most candidates say
"I once had a disagreement with a coworker about how to approach a project. We had different opinions and it created tension. I decided to have a conversation with them to talk it through. We compromised on an approach that incorporated both of our ideas. In the end, we completed the project successfully and our working relationship improved."
Why this falls short:
- •No specific context about the actual conflict
- •Doesn't explain what the disagreement was about or why it mattered
- •Vague resolution ("talked it through", "compromised")
- •No insight into the other person's perspective
- •Doesn't show emotional intelligence or self-awareness
- •Too perfect and sanitized — real conflicts are messier
Personalized Answer
Based on your specific experiences
Situation: Six months ago, I was leading a redesign of our API when our senior backend engineer, Maria, publicly criticized my approach in a team meeting, saying it was "architecturally naive" and would "create technical debt." I felt blindsided and frankly, embarrassed. Task: The conflict escalated when she started making sarcastic comments in code reviews. This wasn't just hurting my feelings — it was creating a toxic dynamic that affected the whole team. I needed to address this directly before it derailed the project and damaged team morale. Action: First, I took 24 hours to cool down instead of responding defensively. I reflected on whether her criticism had merit — honestly, parts of it did. I scheduled a private 1-on-1 with Maria. I started by acknowledging what I'd done wrong: "You're right that I should have consulted with you before proposing the API redesign. You have 8 years of backend experience, and I skipped over that expertise. I'd be frustrated too." Then I addressed the behavior: "That said, the public criticism and sarcastic comments aren't okay. They make me defensive, and I shut down instead of learning from you. Can we establish a different way of working together?" Maria opened up — turns out she'd pitched a similar redesign 2 years ago that got rejected, and seeing me propose it felt like I was getting credit for her idea. I had no idea. We agreed on a new approach: (1) I'd add her as co-author on the design doc, (2) We'd do weekly 30-min technical reviews before code reviews, (3) We'd both commit to "praise publicly, critique privately." Result: That private feedback loop transformed our relationship. Maria caught 3 major architectural flaws I'd missed, making the final design significantly better. The API redesign shipped with 98% code coverage and zero production incidents in the first 3 months. Our working relationship went from antagonistic to collaborative — we now pair-program weekly, and I consider her a mentor. More importantly, I learned that conflict often signals misalignment or unspoken needs. Now when I sense tension, I address it early rather than letting it fester.
Why this works:
- •Honest about negative emotions (embarrassed, hurt feelings)
- •Shows self-reflection and admitting partial fault
- •Demonstrates emotional intelligence (cooling down period, seeking to understand)
- •Uses specific dialogue to make the story vivid
- •Reveals root cause that wasn't obvious (past idea rejection)
- •Concrete action plan with specific agreements
- •Quantifies positive outcomes (98% coverage, zero incidents)
- •Describes lasting relationship change (antagonistic → mentoring)
- •Extracts broader lesson about conflict
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- •Choosing a conflict where you were clearly 100% right (shows no self-awareness)
- •Blaming the other person without acknowledging your role
- •Describing a conflict with your manager (risky unless handled perfectly)
- •Focusing only on resolution, not on understanding the other perspective
- •Choosing a trivial disagreement (e.g., lunch plans) instead of real conflict
- •Not showing emotional vulnerability — conflict is uncomfortable
- •Saying "I don't have conflicts" or "I get along with everyone"
Expert Tips
- •Choose a moderate conflict (not trivial, not career-ending)
- •Show that you were wrong about something or could have handled it better
- •Include specific dialogue — makes the story credible and memorable
- •Explain the other person's perspective with empathy, even if you disagreed
- •Address how the relationship changed after, not just task resolution
- •Avoid naming the person negatively or trashing them
- •Practice telling this without getting emotional — show you've moved past it
The Psychology Behind Interview Success
Daniel Kahneman
Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)
Your opening answer sets the tone. Practice until your first 30 seconds are polished and confident—it creates a halo effect for everything that follows.
Amy Cuddy
Presence (2015)
Lead with warmth, not just credentials. Smile genuinely, show enthusiasm, acknowledge others' contributions before showcasing your own.
Robert Cialdini
Influence (1984)
Give value in the interview—share insights, offer ideas, show genuine interest in their challenges. Don't just take (ask for job) without giving (demonstrating value).
Elizabeth Loftus
Eyewitness Testimony Research (1970s-present)
Include specific details in your stories (dates, numbers, names). Vague answers feel fabricated; vivid details feel authentic.
From Our Blog
Why Your Mock Interviews Aren't Working (And What Actually Does)
87% of candidates who do traditional mock interviews still fail their real interviews. Here's the simulation fidelity problem nobody talks about.
Ready to Practice?
Put these tips into action with AI-powered mock interviews tailored to your background
Start A Rehearsal — Free